Comments on: Cubase SX Complete http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2004/04/28/cubase-sx-complete/ A one man band with no fans Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:11:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: aniki21 http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2004/04/28/cubase-sx-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-1280 aniki21 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2004/04/28/cubase-sx-complete/#comment-1280 You spent $11 on a book you already own? I guess the fact that it's searchable is a huge advantage, though. You spent $11 on a book you already own?

I guess the fact that it’s searchable is a huge advantage, though.

]]> By: phrough http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2004/04/28/cubase-sx-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-1281 phrough Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2004/04/28/cubase-sx-complete/#comment-1281 It says on the site that they didn't publish it... how is it that he could own it? It says on the site that they didn’t publish it… how is it that he could own it?

]]> By: Brad http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2004/04/28/cubase-sx-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-1282 Brad Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2004/04/28/cubase-sx-complete/#comment-1282 The searchability is great. Also the hyperlinks are real handy too. phrough: They didn't publish Cubase SX2 Complete, the sequel. Cubase SX Complete does in fact exist (though it's out of print) and I have a copy of it. The searchability is great. Also the hyperlinks are real handy too.

phrough: They didn’t publish Cubase SX2 Complete, the sequel. Cubase SX Complete does in fact exist (though it’s out of print) and I have a copy of it.

]]> By: aniki21 http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2004/04/28/cubase-sx-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-1283 aniki21 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2004/04/28/cubase-sx-complete/#comment-1283 Oh, they didn't publish version 2. Didn't quite understand, having not really read the initial post. Oh, they didn’t publish version 2. Didn’t quite understand, having not really read the initial post.

]]>