<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Various updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/</link>
	<description>A one man band with no fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:11:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-269044</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 13:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/#comment-269044</guid>
		<description>Brad, you are absolutely correct.  If I am buying a digital audio file it will be either Vorbis or FLAC, preferably FLAC for archival purposes.  I can always transcode it because it is lossless.  Additionally, if (and more importantly when) a new and better format arises (read: patent free, open source, better quality:compression ratio) I can always switch to that and still have a lossless copy of the album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, you are absolutely correct.  If I am buying a digital audio file it will be either Vorbis or FLAC, preferably FLAC for archival purposes.  I can always transcode it because it is lossless.  Additionally, if (and more importantly when) a new and better format arises (read: patent free, open source, better quality:compression ratio) I can always switch to that and still have a lossless copy of the album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darg</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-267606</link>
		<dc:creator>Darg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/#comment-267606</guid>
		<description>Do you travel with your SG? It&#039;d be a shame if it broke after all that work for the snazzy blue finish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you travel with your SG? It&#8217;d be a shame if it broke after all that work for the snazzy blue finish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-261662</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/#comment-261662</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not costly, just a hassle to maintain. And I didn&#039;t expect OGG to sell as well as MP3 but it&#039;s really like 1%. FLAC even vastly outsells OGG, which makes me think that if you&#039;re an OGG fella and FLAC costs the same (which it does), you go for FLAC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not costly, just a hassle to maintain. And I didn&#8217;t expect OGG to sell as well as MP3 but it&#8217;s really like 1%. FLAC even vastly outsells OGG, which makes me think that if you&#8217;re an OGG fella and FLAC costs the same (which it does), you go for FLAC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Page</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-261369</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/#comment-261369</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not entirely surprised that Vorbis didn&#039;t sell as well as MP3 - there&#039;s a lot less brand recognition there, despite its superior quality:filesize ratio.

I don&#039;t mind buying FLAC and re-encoding provided it doesn&#039;t cost me more; how much time, energy and resources would selling Vorbis involve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not entirely surprised that Vorbis didn&#8217;t sell as well as MP3 &#8211; there&#8217;s a lot less brand recognition there, despite its superior quality:filesize ratio.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind buying FLAC and re-encoding provided it doesn&#8217;t cost me more; how much time, energy and resources would selling Vorbis involve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buildingonfire</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-260111</link>
		<dc:creator>buildingonfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/01/31/various-updates/#comment-260111</guid>
		<description>If you buy a shitty guitar &#039;on location&#039; you should sign it and auction it off at the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you buy a shitty guitar &#8216;on location&#8217; you should sign it and auction it off at the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

