<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brad Sucks &#187; recording</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/tag/recording/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradsucks.net</link>
	<description>A one man band with no fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rhythm Delays</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2012/02/07/rhythm-delays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2012/02/07/rhythm-delays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/?p=8447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the issues with finishing this record (that I have figured out in retrospect) has been that my understanding of rhythm and &#8220;tightness&#8221; changed when I was nearly done. Tracks were in the bag and then I suddenly started noticing some songs didn&#8217;t &#8220;groove&#8221; or &#8220;bang&#8221; the way I perhaps wanted them to. Before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the issues with finishing this record (that I have figured out in retrospect) has been that my understanding of rhythm and &#8220;tightness&#8221; changed when I was nearly done. Tracks were in the bag and then I suddenly started noticing some songs didn&#8217;t &#8220;groove&#8221; or &#8220;bang&#8221; the way I perhaps wanted them to.</p>
<p>Before this I&#8217;ve mostly thought about my contributions in music as chords &amp; riffs, melody and words. The groove was just something that happened &#8212; or sometimes mysteriously didn&#8217;t happen and I&#8217;d have no idea why.</p>
<p>But what to do? I can&#8217;t re-record the album every time I learn something new or get better at something. I know that doesn&#8217;t end well for me (or anyone who wants to hear my record in the next ten years).</p>
<p>So I took some time and I&#8217;ve gone back and re-addressed things, trying to avoid re-recording everything or changing them too much (people already like a lot of these demos! some have already been licensed!). Here&#8217;s an example of one I&#8217;m working on right now:</p>
<p><a href="http://media.bradsucks.net/misc/feelfree-original.mp3" class="htrack">Excerpt of the original &#8220;Feel Free Plastic Surgery!&#8221; instrumental</a></p>
<p><a href="http://media.bradsucks.net/misc/feelfree-new.mp3" class="htrack">Excerpt of the new version</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s been confusing to diagnose and treat this without starting over. In this one I ditched the South American drum loop that I wrote the song on top of and replaced it with a more straight ahead rock pattern I tapped in. Then re-recorded the bass to fit better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still working on it (I&#8217;m concerned the snare on the 4 is late sometimes), but the new one is more fun to me, dancier and rockier. It&#8217;s such a small change and I feel dumb that it&#8217;s taken me forever to understand and figure out. But&#8230; maybe it&#8217;s a good thing? I don&#8217;t know, we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2012/02/07/rhythm-delays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.bradsucks.net/misc/feelfree-original.mp3" length="695274" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://media.bradsucks.net/misc/feelfree-new.mp3" length="695274" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Owsinski&#8217;s isolation posts</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2010/06/13/bobby-owsinskis-isolation-posts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2010/06/13/bobby-owsinskis-isolation-posts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2010/06/13/bobby-owsinskis-isolation-posts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I happened across Bobby Owsinski&#8217;s blog when he replied to my review of one of his books. Lately he&#8217;s been posting links to a lot of isolated parts of songs with his comments on them, which is really interesting if you&#8217;re a recording nerd. Here are a few of my favorites: &#8220;Enter Sandman&#8221; Isolated Vocal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happened across <a href="http://bobbyowsinski.blogspot.com/">Bobby Owsinski&#8217;s blog</a> when he replied to <a href="http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2010/02/26/how-to-make-your-band-sound-great-review/">my review of one of his books</a>. Lately he&#8217;s been posting links to a lot of isolated parts of songs with his comments on them, which is really interesting if you&#8217;re a recording nerd. Here are a few of my favorites:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://bobbyowsinski.blogspot.com/2010/06/enter-sandman-isolated-vocal.html">&#8220;Enter Sandman&#8221; Isolated Vocal</a></li>
<li><a href="http://bobbyowsinski.blogspot.com/2010/06/ticket-to-ride-isolated-vocals.html">&#8220;Ticket To Ride&#8221; Isolated Vocals</a></li>
<li><a href="http://bobbyowsinski.blogspot.com/2010/05/foo-fighters-everlong-isolated-drums.html">Foo Fighters &#8220;Everlong&#8221; Isolated Drums And Vocals</a></li>
<li><a href="http://bobbyowsinski.blogspot.com/2010/06/beat-it-isolated-drums.html">Michael Jackson&#8217;s &#8220;Beat It&#8221; &#8211; Isolated Drums</a></li>
<li><a href="http://bobbyowsinski.blogspot.com/2010/04/wont-get-fooled-again-lessons-from.html">&#8220;Won&#8217;t Get Fooled Again&#8221; &#8211; Lessons From The Isolated Guitar</a></li>
</ul>
<p>And here are links to the categories themselves:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://bobbyowsinski.blogspot.com/search/label/isolated%20vocals">Isolated vocals</a></li>
<li><a href="http://bobbyowsinski.blogspot.com/search/label/isolated%20guitar%20track">Isolated guitar track</a></li>
<li><a href="http://bobbyowsinski.blogspot.com/search/label/isolated%20drums">Isolated drums</a></li>
</ul>
<p>I hope he keeps it up. Also: I find the amount of reverb on older vocal recordings to be crazy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2010/06/13/bobby-owsinskis-isolation-posts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adventures in Field Recording</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2010/03/30/adventures-in-field-recording/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2010/03/30/adventures-in-field-recording/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field-recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2010/03/30/adventures-in-field-recording/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bought a Zoom H4N field recorder a few months ago. I wanted to broaden the sounds I use in my recordings and do some experimental stuff. I don&#8217;t have a huge field recording passion &#8211; I&#8217;m not very interested in recording a storm or a train. But I do like recordings of people behaving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="zoomh4n" border="0" alt="zoomh4n" align="right" src="http://www.bradsucks.net/images/7087b96cd4f7_11C6A/zoomh4n.jpg" width="189" height="240" /> I bought a <a href="http://www.zoom.co.jp/english/products/h4n/">Zoom H4N field recorder</a> a few months ago. I wanted to broaden the sounds I use in my recordings and do some experimental stuff. I don&#8217;t have a huge field recording passion &#8211; I&#8217;m not very interested in recording a storm or a train. But I do like recordings of people behaving naturally. It&#8217;s been fun, the quality is great and listening back to most recordings I feel like I&#8217;m in the room again. Which for a lot of situations is more interesting to me than taking a photograph as far as capturing a memory.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s a montage of some of the recordings I&#8217;ve done with it since I got it:</p>
<p><a class="htrack" href="http://media.bradsucks.net/misc/Field-Recording-I.mp3">Field Recording I</a> [5.4 MB]</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>[0:00]</strong> Justin (my drummer) has a giant, giant empty room in his basement. This is me trying out the reverb in it. </li>
<li><strong>[0:05]</strong> At a Barn practice I made some jokes about Bryan Adams and then wound up singing Summer of &#8217;69. </li>
<li><strong>[0:25]</strong> And then &#8220;Run To You&#8221; but I couldn&#8217;t remember any of the lyrics really. </li>
<li><strong>[0:39]</strong> Then, after being exposed to a bunch of ska <a href="http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2010/02/26/how-to-make-your-band-sound-great-review/">recently</a>, I suggested the worst combination in the world might be a ska version of Bryan Adams&#8217; <em>Everything I Do, I Do It For You</em>. <strong>[1:03]</strong> And then we improv it. </li>
<li><strong>[1:28]</strong> <a href="http://www.bradsucks.net/music/total-breakdown/">Total Breakdown</a> in Brad Sucks practice. Next time I&#8217;m gonna feed the computer output (vocals and synth) into the H4N. I think that&#8217;ll sound better. </li>
<li><strong>[1:55]</strong> Rehearsal of <a href="http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/11/27/i-think-youre-alright-demo/">I Think You&#8217;re Alright</a> for a performance a few weeks ago. </li>
<li><strong>[2:31]</strong> As a favor I did sound for a bluegrass show by <a href="http://yonderhill.ca/">Yonder Hill</a>. They needed eight microphones but they were very good. This is them doing &#8220;Beefsteaks When I&#8217;m Hungry, Whiskey When I&#8217;m Dry&#8221;. There is a banjo solo. </li>
<li><strong>[2:54] </strong>My guitarist Ben and his wife performed an intimate Valentine&#8217;s dinner-music show. This is them covering Here Comes the Sun by The Beatles. On this one I fed the monitor output into one of the H4N inputs so the vocals sound a lot clearer. </li>
<li><strong>[3:28]</strong> At Brad Sucks practice: Ben randomly plays an Irish jig riff, Justin says &#8220;dance, leprechaun, dance&#8221;, and I yell &#8220;WHERE&#8217;S ME GOLD&#8221; in my evil leprechaun voice and then the delay from the microphone makes us all giggle. </li>
</ul>
<p>It&#8217;s a sweet little device. Main complaint is I wish it powered up quicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2010/03/30/adventures-in-field-recording/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.bradsucks.net/misc/Field-Recording-I.mp3" length="5540268" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure &amp; humiliation</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/08/24/failure-humiliation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/08/24/failure-humiliation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[song]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/08/24/failure-humiliation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So I failed again with the monthly demo. My excuse:</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I failed again with the monthly demo. My excuse: it&#8217;s been a stupid crazy busy month and <a href="http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/08/19/hey-i-think-im-hiring/">I&#8217;m addressing the problem</a>, since I can&#8217;t seem to keep up anymore. It&#8217;s not an awful problem to have but it&#8217;s uncool.</p>
<p>Anyway, I need to make myself pay for my failure, so here&#8217;s two humiliatingly incomplete things you can listen to.</p>
<p>#1: Every now and then people ask me to make intro music for their shows or whatever. Then their shows get cancelled or do not air. <a href="http://www.ambermac.com/">Amber MacArthur</a> asked me to do one last year and the show was immediately disintegrated. Here&#8217;s the thing I wrote for her:</p>
<p><a href="http://media.bradsucks.net/misc/Brad_Sucks_-_Intro_Music_for_the_Damned.mp3" class="htrack">Intro Music for the Damned</a> [1.6 MB]</p>
<p>#2: Ben and I have been working on the two-person Brad Sucks live show for a while but are bringing a drummer in now. To help him out with practicing on his own we recorded the live set in my office. Direct-in, one take and at very low volume. Here are some embarrassing clips from that: </p>
<p><a href="http://media.bradsucks.net/misc/Brad_Sucks_-_Crappy_Live_Clips.mp3" class="htrack">Crappy Live Clips</a> [4 MB]</p>
<p>Neither are mixed worth a whatever, etc, etc, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/08/24/failure-humiliation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.bradsucks.net/misc/Brad_Sucks_-_Crappy_Live_Clips.mp3" length="4089635" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://media.bradsucks.net/misc/Brad_Sucks_-_Intro_Music_for_the_Damned.mp3" length="1606895" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reaper 3</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/06/09/reaper-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/06/09/reaper-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/06/09/reaper-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reaper 3 came out a little while ago and I&#8217;ve mentioned that I&#8217;m experimenting with switching to it from Cubase. So far I can&#8217;t imagine going back to Cubase. Some of the things I like: It&#8217;s fast and small. While the 4.4MB installer file size is great, it&#8217;s the responsiveness and quick loading time that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" align="right" src="http://www.bradsucks.net/images/b806679faaf2_DDCD/image.png" width="319" height="247" /> <a href="http://reaper.fm/">Reaper 3</a> came out a little while ago and <a href="http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/04/16/model-home/">I&#8217;ve mentioned</a> that I&#8217;m experimenting with switching to it from Cubase. So far I can&#8217;t imagine going back to Cubase. Some of the things I like:</p>
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s fast and small. While the 4.4MB installer file size is great, it&#8217;s the responsiveness and quick loading time that are truly awesome. Cubase feels bloated and slow after using Reaper, as do most DAWs.</li>
<li>Powerful. The amount of features in it are ridiculous. You may have to hunt for the options, but 99% of the time it&#8217;s there.</li>
<li>I haven&#8217;t had it crash on me yet. </li>
<li>It&#8217;s fully customizable. I feel like I can trick it out as much as I want. From themes to keyboard shortcuts to actions, you can make it your own.</li>
<li>Frequent useful updates. Unlike Cubase&#8217;s usual â€œlaunch buggy, gradually patch those bugs and save any useful new features for the next version you have to pay forâ€ you actually get an amazing amount of updates and improvements.</li>
<li>An active community and approachable developers. Reasonable or good ideas get implemented quickly, developers are responsive in the forums, lots of people were helpful when I was flailing around in â€œI&#8217;m used to Cubase!â€ land.</li>
<li>It plays nice with dual monitors. HOORAY.</li>
<li>Quick search of VST plugins.</li>
<li>I don&#8217;t feel locked in. Project files are in plain text, you can export your stuff easily. You can move your preferences around easily. </li>
</ul>
<p>Some things I don&#8217;t like so much:</p>
<ul>
<li>There are so many options that new (and/or less tech-savvy) users will likely feel overwhelmed hunting down the right checkboxes to get the behavior they expect. It&#8217;s awesome that it&#8217;s so customizable, but I&#8217;d love to see them pick some more universal up-front options and move a lot of the tweaks to a Firefox <em>about:config</em> style interface or just an .ini file. </li>
<li>A lot of the comping/audio behavior doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense to me. The logic behind which items play and which don&#8217;t when they overlay each other on the same track still confuses me, so I try and avoid it. Comping generally works but lacks the precision of Cubase or Logic. </li>
<li>Unlike versions 1 and 2, Reaper 3 doesn&#8217;t have my song Making Me Nervous as the default project. :( :(</li>
</ul>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s been good and I recommend trying it out. There&#8217;s an un-crippled evaluation version so you&#8217;ve got nothing to lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2009/06/09/reaper-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nevermind anniversary</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/09/24/nevermind-anniversary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/09/24/nevermind-anniversary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nevermind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nirvana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/09/24/nevermind-anniversary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seventeen years ago today Nirvana&#8217;s Nevermind was released. I&#8217;m re-watching the Classic Albums Nevermind episode: It&#8217;s real interesting and worth a watch if you&#8217;re a recording nerd or a music fan. Personally I don&#8217;t think the production on Nevermind holds up as well over the years as In Utero, but that&#8217;s me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seventeen years ago today Nirvana&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevermind">Nevermind</a> was released. I&#8217;m re-watching the <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5798023486646870781">Classic Albums Nevermind episode</a>:</p>
<p><embed id="VideoPlayback" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=5798023486646870781&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=true" style="width:400px;height:326px" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"> </embed></p>
<p>It&#8217;s real interesting and worth a watch if you&#8217;re a recording nerd or a music fan. </p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t think the production on Nevermind holds up as well over the years as In Utero, but that&#8217;s me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/09/24/nevermind-anniversary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My broken stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/05/09/my-broken-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/05/09/my-broken-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/05/09/my-broken-stuff/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything around here&#8217;s breaking. The first channel on my Presonus Bluetube magically broke during the night. As you can see, the first channel input is pegged to the max even though there&#8217;s nothing plugged into channel 1: And for the past couple of months I&#8217;ve been aware the phantom power light on my Behringer Eurorack [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything around here&#8217;s breaking. The first channel on my Presonus Bluetube magically broke during the night. As you can see, the first channel input is pegged to the max even though there&#8217;s nothing plugged into channel 1: </p>
<p><img height="180" alt="Broken stuff 003" src="http://www.bradsucks.net/images/Mybrokenstuff_C4EE/Brokenstuff003.jpg" width="240" border="0"/> </p>
<p>And for the past couple of months I&#8217;ve been aware the phantom power light on my Behringer Eurorack UB1204-PRO is always on regardless of the switch setting on the back:</p>
<p><img height="180" alt="Broken stuff 002" src="http://www.bradsucks.net/images/Mybrokenstuff_C4EE/Brokenstuff002.jpg" width="240" border="0"/> </p>
<p>(It&#8217;s the red light beside the blue one. Spooky!)</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ll open up the BlueTube and see if there&#8217;s anything obviously wrong inside. Wait, first I&#8217;ll shake it.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> shaking did nothing. I opened it up and there was nothing broken looking. Poked around a bit and tugged on wires and things, powered it back on and now it works again. La-di-da.</p>
<p><strong>Update 2:</strong> It broke again after a couple days of working fine. Presonus says $65 + shipping to repair. Blergh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2008/05/09/my-broken-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monitor/headphone issue</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2007/06/07/monitorheadphone-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2007/06/07/monitorheadphone-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2007/06/07/monitorheadphone-issue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m hoping someone can point me towards what to buy to solve this problem. For the longest time I&#8217;ve been using a mixing board as gain control and a headphone switch for my monitors. Here&#8217;s the rough layout: I&#8217;ve been aware using a mixing board for this small task is stupid (and a waste of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hoping someone can point me towards what to buy to solve this problem.</p>
<p>For the longest time I&#8217;ve been using a mixing board as gain control and a headphone switch for my monitors. Here&#8217;s the rough layout:</p>
<p><img height="388" alt="mixer2" src="http://www.bradsucks.net/images/Monitorheadphoneissue_F2E2/mixer2.jpg" width="368" border="0"/> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been aware using a mixing board for this small task is stupid (and a waste of desk space) for a while but I didn&#8217;t know what to replace it with. The board&#8217;s slowly dying now though so I need to figure out what to replace it with. Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve thought so far:</p>
<ul>
<li>I could plug the Delta 66 sound card directly into the monitors, but then how do I switch to the headphones? I hate dicking around in software to change volume and settings every time I want to do something.  </li>
<li>I thought a headphone amp like the <a href="http://www.zzounds.com/item--BEHHA400">Behringer HA400</a>&nbsp;might be what I was looking for but I&#8217;d have to feed my sound card output into one of those headphone inputs and that seems sorta gross. Also I don&#8217;t need the two extra outputs and would like a mute switch for the monitors.</li>
</ul>
<p>Aaaand that&#8217;s about it. Digging through Behringer&#8217;s product list hasn&#8217;t helped much. Basically I need two 1/4&#8243; or XLR inputs &amp; outputs, two volume dials and a mute button in a wee little package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2007/06/07/monitorheadphone-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened To Dynamic Range</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2006/03/28/what-happened-to-dynamic-range/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2006/03/28/what-happened-to-dynamic-range/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2006/03/28/what-happened-to-dynamic-range/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Happened To Dynamic Range is an article that&#8217;s been making the rounds lately. Bob doesn&#8217;t give any examples of modern bands or recordings that he&#8217;s talking about so it&#8217;s hard to make much of his opinions. And it&#8217;s hard not to blow off the entire article after this statement: The music available today isn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cdmasteringservices.com/dynamicrange.htm">What Happened To Dynamic Range</a> is an article that&#8217;s been making the rounds lately. Bob doesn&#8217;t give any examples of modern bands or recordings that he&#8217;s talking about so it&#8217;s hard to make much of his opinions. And it&#8217;s hard not to blow off the entire article after this statement:</p>
<blockquote><p><font color="#000000"></font><font size="2" face="Verdana">  The music available today isn&#8217;t                     musical at all.Ã‚Â  It&#8217;s best described as anti-music.Ã‚Â                      It&#8217;s anti-music because the life is being squashed out of it                     through over compression during the tracking, mixing, and mastering                     stages.Ã‚Â  It&#8217;s simply, non musical. It&#8217;s no wonder that consumers don&#8217;t want to                     pay for the CDs being produced today. </font></p></blockquote>
<p>Beep beep cranky old man alert. <em>The music you kids listen to isn&#8217;t music.</em> There are certainly a lot of styles these days that leave me cold (such as the alterna boy-rock super compressed pitch-corrected and computer harmonised stuff), but I&#8217;m also heading into being a cranky old man myself.</p>
<p>I was going to pass this article by and not mention it at all except that I&#8217;ve been listening to a lot of albums from the 70s lately and almost across the board I wish they were mixed and mastered more aggressively. Led Zeppelin sounds kind of weak when it should be knocking my head off when it rocks out. I&#8217;m listening to Dancing Days here right now and want to run the whole thing through <a href="http://www.izotope.com/products/audio/ozone/">iZotope Ozone</a> and crank it to the max. In particular, the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0009SOFFY/ref=bradsucks-20">re-master of Fun House</a> kicks so much more ass than the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2006/03/28/what-happened-to-dynamic-range/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KVRwiki</title>
		<link>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2006/01/08/kvrwiki/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2006/01/08/kvrwiki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2006/01/08/kvrwiki/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KVRwiki &#8211; the great KVRAudio site has launched a wiki for audio info.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kvraudio.com/wiki/">KVRwiki</a> &#8211; the great KVRAudio site has launched a wiki for audio info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bradsucks.net/archives/2006/01/08/kvrwiki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

